This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| rougui [16.01.2020:1105] – aequivinius | rougui [19.01.2020:1414] (current) – aequivinius | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| * **Western** (25 IX 19): Not fruity in the nose, quite peculiar, fimo and green cinnamon. Light brew, but still good body. Not too complex, actually. A little bit vanillated, almost like a face cream. | * **Western** (25 IX 19): Not fruity in the nose, quite peculiar, fimo and green cinnamon. Light brew, but still good body. Not too complex, actually. A little bit vanillated, almost like a face cream. | ||
| * **Blind Western** (16 I 20): elegant nose, full, but not overwhelming. A little baked sweetness, but with sugar glazing. Very similar in taste. Bit of greenery contrasting the sweetness. If I had to bet, I'd say it's a really good qingxin; but oh no, wrong! | * **Blind Western** (16 I 20): elegant nose, full, but not overwhelming. A little baked sweetness, but with sugar glazing. Very similar in taste. Bit of greenery contrasting the sweetness. If I had to bet, I'd say it's a really good qingxin; but oh no, wrong! | ||
| + | * **Blind Western** (19 I 20): lighter, less deep, but more directly sweet. Candied flowers. Some face cream note. Great succulence in cup. Lively, energetic. Face cream note, again. | ||
| + | * Got it (19 I 20), face cream note gave it away. | ||