This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| tgy [31.10.2021:1210] – aequivinius | tgy [02.11.2021:1039] (current) – aequivinius | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| * **Western** (22 I 20): what a pleasant nose! Pineapple sugar candies, a bit of stale vegetable broth, too. A thick sweetness pressing through at times. Cup a bit bland, a bit thin, too. A light woody bitterness, good almond milk echo. Not a big fan, though. | * **Western** (22 I 20): what a pleasant nose! Pineapple sugar candies, a bit of stale vegetable broth, too. A thick sweetness pressing through at times. Cup a bit bland, a bit thin, too. A light woody bitterness, good almond milk echo. Not a big fan, though. | ||
| * **Blind Western** (28 I 20): dense fruitiness, fresh apricots, actually, rather than dried ones. Later candied fruits. Cup full, only hints of wood, continues in the apricot-vein. Not too sweet. I'm wanting to say it's Jinxuan Lalashan, but my notes differ. Notes match best with Anxi TGY, but I don't find the milky-ness of TGY (maybe yes?), not the tingling of Dong Ding. So I guessed right, notes triumph impression, and there was a silkiness to it and medium fruitiness. | * **Blind Western** (28 I 20): dense fruitiness, fresh apricots, actually, rather than dried ones. Later candied fruits. Cup full, only hints of wood, continues in the apricot-vein. Not too sweet. I'm wanting to say it's Jinxuan Lalashan, but my notes differ. Notes match best with Anxi TGY, but I don't find the milky-ness of TGY (maybe yes?), not the tingling of Dong Ding. So I guessed right, notes triumph impression, and there was a silkiness to it and medium fruitiness. | ||
| + | * Western (2 XI 21): quite deep and roasted; much fruitier! Cup likewise, intense apricot tart. This however develops a nice mineralic underpinning as it chills, woodiness for fruitiness. | ||
| ===Hochland TGY 06=== | ===Hochland TGY 06=== | ||