ホモテナシ

Trace:

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

imari [10.10.2019:1648] – created 178.197.227.34imari [10.10.2019:2003] (current) – aequivinius
Line 1: Line 1:
-   * Lasted from around 1615 (Genna) to 1868 (end of Edo) +   * Lasted from around 1615 (Genna) to 1868 (end of Edo). Most important are Old 九谷 and 柿右衛門, both defined by their domestic or European markets, respectively. 
-   * Early 伊万里: Thickly crafted, narrow foots, no biscuit-firing; shape inspired by Korean wares, motives by Chinese. +   * Praised, but somewhat atypical for traditional Japanese crafts. Inspired by 景德镇 (Jingdezhen) kilns in China; but Old 九谷 went beyond. 
-   * 1650s: Thinly crafted, wide foot. Two styles:+   * Explained in CQ79 
 + 
 +   * Early 伊万里: Thickly crafted, narrow foots, no biscuit-firing; possibly thrown, then pressed into a mold and trimmed; shape inspired by Korean wares, motives by Chinese. 
 +   * 1650s: Thinly crafted, wide foot. Pressed onto a mold, attaching foot to the body. Two styles:
          * 藍九谷（あい　くたに）(Cobalt 九谷) for simple blue-and-white porcelains          * 藍九谷（あい　くたに）(Cobalt 九谷) for simple blue-and-white porcelains
-         * Old 九谷 for polychrome pieces from that time. +         * **Old 九谷**, also known as 交趾（こうち）or 南京（なんきん）, for polychrome pieces from that time; and also blue-white with only red decorations, which was used by the first 柿右衛門 as decoration. Was popular in Japan. These were later copied in vicinity of the //actual// 九谷 kiln, hence the confusion of the name. That kiln continued the style, so now there are 九谷-style wares from 伊万里 and 九谷. 
-→ These 3 are so different from the following styles, that they used to be believed to be from 九谷 kilns, not 伊万里!  +→ These 3 used to be believed to be from 九谷 kilns, not 伊万里! But in reality, they are 伊万里 ware.
-→ These 3 also born from a desire to imitate Chinese Ming ceramics.+
  
 {{ ::imari.jpg?400 |}} {{ ::imari.jpg?400 |}}
  
-   * Between 1660-1690 there was a kiln called 柿右衛門（かきえもん）, that originally produced 藍九谷; but then later blue-white wares known as 柿右衛門. +   * Between 1660-1690 there was a kiln called **柿右衛門（かきえもん）**, that originally produced 藍九谷; but then later polychrome wares known as 柿右衛門. These wares, opposed to Old 九谷, were mostly made for exporting to Europe. 1959 the VOC imported a lot of them. These were then copied by Meissen.
-         * If I google 柿右衛門, it's mostly polychrome pieces actually... +
-         * This style is represented by motifs of red maples, deers, horsetails... +
-         * Influenced by Chinese Ching ceramics.+
  
 {{ ::kakiemon.jpg?400 |}} {{ ::kakiemon.jpg?400 |}}
Line 18: Line 17:
    * 鍋島（なべしま）　    * 鍋島（なべしま）　
  
 +→ Both Old 九谷 and 柿右衛門 lost popularity in 18th century, because they were superseded by gold-painted 伊万里 ware called 金襴手（きんらん　で）, which was popular in Japan and Europe.
  
Last modified: 10.10.2019:1648